Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Independent t-test analysis of student’s perception of academic dishonesty by differences in school size

From: Discussing the misnomer: Exploring multidimensional perception to academic dishonesty in Nigeria. Do school attributes really matter?

Measures of dishonesty

Size

N

Mean

SD

έ

Df

t-cal

95%CI

p-va

Plagiarism

Large

6376

10.28

2.03

0.02

     

Small

4261

10.22

2.00

0.03

10,635

1.39

− 0.022

0.13

0.162

Cheating

Large

6376

8.07

0.33

0.00

     

Small

4261

8.07

0.33

0.00

10,635

− 0.28

− 0.014

0.01

0.778

Falsification

Large

6376

15.43

3.10

0.03

     

Small

4261

15.37

3.21

0.04

10,635

0.95

− 0.063

0.18

0.338

Fabrication

Large

6376

11.67

3.44

0.04

     

Small

4261

11.61

3.43

0.05

10,635

0.86

− 0.07

0.19

0.389

Impersonation

Large

6376

8.65

1.12

0.01

     

Small

4261

8.68

1.18

0.01

10,635

−1.53

− 0.07

0.00

0.122

  1. SD Standard deviation, CI Confidence interval, N Number of observations, t-critical-1.96, MD Mean difference
Back to article page

International Journal for Educational Integrity

ISSN: 1833-2595

Contact us