Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean scores and standard deviations of scales

From: Hungarian university students’ perceptions of plagiarism

Scales

Mean

Standard deviation

Scale 1: Factors that exacerbate plagiarism

2.80

0.77

1. Short deadlines or a heavy workload give me the right to plagiarise a bit.

2.47

1.22

2. A plagiarised paper does no harm to the value of a university degree.

2.80

1.22

3. Those who say they have never plagiarised are lying.

3.78

1.24

4. Plagiarism can be justified if I currently have more important obligations or tasks to do.

2.27

1.12

5. Sometimes, it is necessary to plagiarise.

3.24

1.16

6. I am tempted to plagiarise if I have permission from a friend to copy his or her work.

2.84

1.21

7. I am tempted to plagiarise if I currently have more important obligations or tasks to do.

2.85

1.20

8. I am tempted to plagiarise because, even if caught, the punishment will be light (the reward outweighs the risk).

2.17

1.12

Scale 2: Justification for plagiarism

3.58

0.69

1. Sometimes you cannot avoid using other people’s words, because there are only so many ways to describe something.

3.95

0.95

2. It is justified to use previous descriptions of a concept or theory, because they remain the same.

3.51

1.02

3. Self-plagiarism is not punishable because it is not harmful (you cannot steal from yourself).

4.03

1.08

4. Undergraduate students, because they are just learning the ropes, should receive milder punishment for plagiarism.

3.57

1.20

5. It is justified to use your own previous work, without providing citation, in order to complete the current work.

3.42

1.21

6. Since plagiarism is taking other people’s words rather than tangible assets, it should not be considered a serious offence.

3.00

1.18

Scale 3: Severity and penalty

3.27

0.63

1. Plagiarised parts of a student’s paper should be ignored if the paper is otherwise of high quality.

3.03

1.10

2. Self-plagiarism should not be punishable in the same way as plagiarism is.

4.10

1.04

3. If you cannot write well because of unfamiliarity with the topic area, it is justified to copy parts of a paper already published in that area in order to accurately represent those ideas.

2.92

1.25

4. Given a commonly perceived decline in moral and ethical standards, it is important to discuss issues like plagiarism and self-plagiarism.

3.76

1.02

5. Plagiarism is as bad as stealing an exam.

3.39

1.17

6. Plagiarism undermines independent thought.

2.90

1.24

7. Since plagiarism is taking other people’s words rather than tangible assets, it should not be considered a serious offence.

3.00

1.18

8. Plagiarism is not a big deal.

3.10

1.11