Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 5 Classification accuracy scales for human-written and AI-generated texts

From: Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text

Human-written (NEGATIVE) text (docs 01-Hum & 02-MT), and the tool says that it is written by a:

 [100—80%) human

True negative

TN

  [80—60%) human

Partially true negative

PTN

  [60—40%) human

Unclear

UNC

  [40—20%) human

Partially false positive

PFP

  [20—0%] human

False positive

FP

AI-generated (POSITIVE) text (docs 03-AI, 04-AI, 05-ManEd & 06-Para), and the tool says it is written by a:

  [100—80%) human

False negative

FN

  [80—60%) human

Partially false negative

PFN

  [60—40%) human

Unclear

UNC

  [40—20%) human

Partially true positive

PTP

  [20—0%] human

True positive

TP

  1. [ or] means inclusive ( or) means exclusive