Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of case deliberation

From: Evaluating empowerment towards responsible conduct of research in a small private online course

  

All cases (47)

Own case (13)

Pregiven case (34)

Length of reflection

Very brief

6 (12.8%)

2 (15.4%)

4 (11.8%)

Small sentences

23 (48,9%)

3 (23.1%)

20 (58.8%)

Full sentences

18 (38,3%)

8 (61.5%)

10 (29.4%)

Misconduct or QRP

Misconduct

15 (31.9%)

4 (30.8%)

11 (32.3%)

QRP

30 (63.8%)

8 (61.5%)

21 (61.7%)

undecided

2 (4.3%)

1 (7.7%)

1 (2.9%)

Average number Considerations

 

4.44

5,08

4.21

St dev

1.59

1.93

1.41

Taken perspective

None

20 (42.5%)

5 (38.4%)

15 (44.11%)

One

21 (44.7%)

4 (30.8%)

17 (50%)

multiple

6 (12.8%)

4 (30.8%)

2 (5.8%)

Principle/values

None mentioned

5 (10.6%)

1 (7.7%)

4 (11.8%)

Mentioned, not explained

30 (63.8%)

11 (84.6%)

17 (50%)

Mentioned, explained

12 (25.5%)

2:1 (7.7%)

13 (38.2%)

Reasoned decision

Yes

15 (32.6%)

7 (54.8%)

8 (23.5%)

No

32 (68.1%)

6 (46.2%)

26 (76.4%)

Action oriented

No

10(21.2%)

3 (23.1%)

7 (20.6%)

One action

23 (48.9%)

9 (69.2%)

14 (41.2%)

Multiple steps

14 (29.8%)

1 (7.7%)

13 (38.2%)

Reflection model used?

No

3 (6.4%)

1 (7.7%)

2 (5.9%)

Superficially

8 (17%)

1 (7.7%)

7 (20.6%)

Fully

36 (76.5%)

11 (84.6%)

25 (73.5%)